When I heard about Representative Jehan Gordon sitting on the Senate's Special Committee on Education Reform, I posted this piece about “Illinois upcoming Education Reform fight”. At that time I mentioned Gordon’s being involved with Stand for Children.I felt Gordon was an excellent candidate for the Committee on Education Reform, because I knew that she had already been working on reaching out to those in the education community for input since 2009 (see invitation above - click to enlarge). I find it interesting that Bradley McMillan, our local ethicist, is implying that Gordon may have been unethical now that the education reforms are begining to see the light of day.
From what I know, I would agree with Gordon, that her support for reforms predates the campaign contributions.
Education reform linked to donation?
Rep. Jehan Gordon insists her support of bill predates $100,000 campaign donation
How much did campaign donations smooth the way for education reforms? The head of an out-of-state group that helped craft the education reform package Illinois lawmakers passed nearly unanimously this spring put a focus on that question with some unguarded comments at a conference at Colorado's Aspen Institute early this month.
And because she was one of the biggest recipients of campaign cash from Jonah Edelman's Stand For Children organization - some $100,000 in 2010 out of about $444,000 in donations she raised in the last six months of her successful re-election campaign - state Rep. Jehan Gordon, D-Peoria, is caught up in the controversy. She insists her support for reform predates those campaign contributions.
Legislature who had supported pension reforms during 2010, Edelman said during his Aspen remarks. But his organization stepped in with campaign donations targeted at several key races - six Democratic candidates including Gordon, and three Republicans.

After the election, the group crafted a series of proposed reforms that "tied tenure and layoffs to performance . . . streamlined dismissal of ineffective tenured teachers substantially" among other things and discussed it with Madigan, Edelman said. "He said he was supportive. The next day he created an Educational Reform (Committee), and his political director called to ask for our suggestions who should be on it."Gordon was among those who were quickly appointed to the committee, as was the only other incumbent House member to receive donations from Stand for Children and win re-election. That move, said McMillan, highlights the ease with which money can appear to buy access to politicians.
Gordon was blunt in her reaction to the controversy: "You don't buy my vote." She turned the question on itself, arguing she'd also received donations in the past from union groups that were wary of Stand for Children's aims."Having taken support from education groups before does not make me beholden to anybody (either)," she said.
In fact, she said, she worked with all interested parties, from Edelman's group to state teachers unions. She touted her frequent contact with the latter group - including District 150's teachers union - while working on the reform package.
Most of the changes had been discussed for years, Gordon said, without lawmakers having a grasp of "how do you tackle this third-rail issue?" That included taking on such touchy union-related issues as teacher tenure.
When she heard what Stand for Children was supporting, "I felt it was an excellent platform, it was something I could support," Gordon said. And she did, after also giving local educators a heads up that she would be backing the measures and soliciting their input.
Because of that, Gordon said that "I absolutely don't regret" taking the $100,000 contribution. "I stayed true to what I've always said. I've always said we need to be doing more in education."
Gordon said she worries that Edelman's remarks "could potentially set us back" from any further education reforms. "This was a first step. There are a lot of things we can be doing to ensure that kids are receiving the best quality education." Source
When she heard what Stand for Children was supporting, "I felt it was an excellent platform, it was something I could support," Gordon said. And she did, after also giving local educators a heads up that she would be backing the measures and soliciting their input.
Because of that, Gordon said that "I absolutely don't regret" taking the $100,000 contribution. "I stayed true to what I've always said. I've always said we need to be doing more in education."
Gordon said she worries that Edelman's remarks "could potentially set us back" from any further education reforms. "This was a first step. There are a lot of things we can be doing to ensure that kids are receiving the best quality education." Source













